doc. Mgr. et Mgr. Juraj Franek PhD. - bibliografie
Bibliografie (aktuální ke dni 20. 5. 2024)
A. Autorské monografie
2020. Naturalism and Protectionism in the Study of Religions. London/New York: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-3500-8237-3, 267 pp.
Ohlasy:
[01] Ambasciano, L. 2020. ‘From Gnosticism to Agnotology: A Reply to Robertson and Talmont-Kaminski’. Religio 28(1): 37–44.
[02] Wiebe, D. 2021. An Argument in Defence of a Strictly Scientific Study of Religion: The Controversy at Delphi. Toronto: Institute for the Advanced Study of Religion.
[03] Shults, F. L. 2022. ‘Studying Close Entity Encounters of the Psychedelic Kind: Insights from the Cognitive Evolutionary Science of Religion’. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.
[04] Roubekas, N. P. 2022. The Study of Greek and Roman Religions: Insularity and Assimilation. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
[05] Guthrie, S. E./Porubanová, M. 2023. ‘Faces in the Clouds and Voices in the Wind: Anthropomorphism, Agency Detection and Human Cognition’. In: Y. Lior/J. Lane (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Evolutionary Approaches to Religion. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 94–110.
[06] Martin, L. H. 2023. ‘Is There a Future for a Scientific Study of Religion?’ In: M. Freudenberg/F. Elwert/T. Karis/M. Rademacher/J. Schlamelcher (eds.), Stepping Back and Looking Ahead: Twelve Years of Studying Religious Contact at the Käte Hamburger Kolleg Bochum. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 381–415.
2017. Naturalismus a protekcionismus ve studiu náboženství. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. ISBN 978-80-210-9798-9, 317 pp.
Ohlasy:
[01] Václavík, D. 2018. ‘Juraj Franek, Naturalismus a protekcionismus ve studio náboženství, Brno: Masarykova univerzita 2017, 317 s. ISBN 978-80-210-8798-9’. Religio 26(1): 83–86.
[02] Hampejs, T./Chalupa, A. 2018. ‘Formalizující modelování v neintencionální historii náboženství: Transdisciplinarita mezi přírodní vědou a historickou religionistikou?’. Religio 26(2): 99–132.
[03] Král, J. 2019. ‘Ethnocentrismus jako součást klasifikací: Srovnání konstrukce hinduismu a středověkých herezí’. Sacra 17(2): 31–37.
[04] Chlup, R. 2019. ‘Jak náboženství vysvětlovat nereduktivně: Hranice racionality a sebereflexivita’. Religio 27(2): 163–200.
[05] Motal, J. 2019. ‘Být pomalí jako želvy: K vědě symbiotické a pluralitní’. Religio 27(2): 201–219.
[06] Maňo, P. 2019. ‘Juraj Franek: Naturalismus a protekcionismus ve studiu náboženství [Naturalism and Protectionism in the Study of Religions]. Brno: Filosofická fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, 2017, 320 p.’. Slovenský národopis 67(4): 465–468.
[07] Havlíček, J. 2022. ‘Za horizont rozumění a vysvětlení: K epistemologii antropologického studia náboženství’. In: H. Horáková (ed.), Antropologické perspektivy současných světů: Trendy, přístupy a výzvy. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, 89–134.
B. Publikace v zahraničních odborných časopisech, kolektivních monografiích a encyklopediích
2023. ‘“Seal of Solomon” on a Bilingual defixio from Carnuntum (Pannonia)’. In: R. Fialová/J. Hoblík/P. Kitzler (eds.), Hellenism, Early Judaism, and Early Christianity: Transmission and Transformation of Ideas. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 205–222.
2022. ‘Early Byzantine Amuletic Pendant for Megale, Daughter of Charitous (BNF Froehner.630)’. Tyche 37: 97-107.
2022. ‘Socrates’. In: D. G. Hunter/P. J. J. van Geest/B. J. Lietaert Peerbolte (eds.), Brill Encyclopedia of Early Christianity. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
2020. ‘Hoc ego averse scribo: The Aversus-formula on Ancient Greek and Latin Curse Tablets’. In: O. Šefčík/R. Sukač/H. H. Bichlmeier (eds.), Etymologus: Festschrift für Václav Blažek. Hamburg: Baar, 375–392. (autorský podíl 50%; spoluautorka: Daniela Urbanová)
Ohlasy:
[01] Favi, F. 2022. ‘ἀμφαρίστερος, ἐπαρίστερος (Phryn. PS 2.7-8, Phryn. Ecl. 227, Poll. 2.160)’. In: O. Tribulato (ed.), Digital Encyclopedia of Atticism.
2020. ‘The Naturalistic Theory of Religion in Pomponazzi’s De incantationibus and Its Significance’. In: C. Pimentel/M. Brito/M. Miranda/M. L. Resende/S. T. de Pinho (eds.), O Humanismo Português e Europeu no 5º centenário do Cicero Lusitanus: Dom Jerónimo Osório (1515-1580). Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 9–28.
2020. ‘Apotropaic Amulet from the Collection of Gustave Schlumberger with a Bilingual Inscription in Greek and Samaritan Hebrew’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 216: 156–166. (autorský podíl 90%; spoluautor: Diego Corral Varela)
Ohlasy:
[01] Ast, R. 2021. ‘ΧΜΓ = ΡΑΦΑΓΗΛ in an Apotropaic Amulet’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 217: 178.
[02] Aliquot, J./Gatier, P.-L. 2021. ‘Bulletin épigraphique 2021: Syrie, Phénicie, Palestine, Arabie’. Revue des Études Grecques 134: 625-636.
[03] Calhoun, R. M. 2023. ‘The Apotropaic Paul’. In: D. P. Moessner/P. B. Duff/J. E. Spittler/R. M. Calhoun (eds.), Paul, Christian Textuality, and the Hermeneutics of Late Antiquity: Essays in Honor of Margaret M. Mitchell. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 238-283.
2019. ‘The Reception of Socrates in Tertullian’. In: Ch. Moore (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 435–452.
Ohlasy:
[01] Sterling, G. E. 2023. Shaping the Past to Define the Present: Luke-Acts and Apologetic Historiography. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.
[02] Ramelli, I. L. E. 2023. ‘A Maxim of Greek Philosophy found in Scripture: “Know Yourself” in Origen and Reflections in Gregory of Nyssa’. In: O. J. Filtvedt/J. Schröter (eds.), Know Yourself: Echoes and Interpretations of the Delphic Maxim in Ancient Judaism, Christianity, and Philosophy. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 421-471.
2019. ‘“May Their Limbs Melt, Just as This Lead Shall Melt…”: Sympathetic Magic and similia similibus Formulae in Greek and Latin Curse Tablets (Part 1)’. Philologia Classica 14(1): 27–55. (autorský podíl 60%; spoluautorka: Daniela Urbanová)
Ohlasy:
[01] Sabaté Vidal, V. 2020. ‘El plomo en el Plutarco: Defixiones y cartas entre la historia y el mito’. In: J. A. Clúa Serena (ed.), Mythologica Plutarchea: Estudios sobre los mitos en Plutarcho. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 359–369.
[02] Streinu, A./Schwarcz, D. Z./Mirea, D. 2020. ‘Mirror, mirror …: Reflections on the Functionality of a Small Lead Find from Acic Suat (Baia, Tulcea County)’. Peuce (n.s.) 18: 171–202.
[03] Belousov, A. V. 2020. Defixiones Olbiae Ponticae (DefOlb). Moscow: M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
[04] Dasen, V. 2020. ‘Play and Games in Ostia’. In: A. Karivieri (ed.), Life and Death in a Multicultural Harbour City: Ostia Antica from the Republic through Late Antiquity. Roma: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae = Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 47: 305–311.
[05] Kayachev, B. 2021. ‘The Royal Mail of the Underworld: Notes on Two Curse Tablets from Aquincum.’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 217: 181–184.
[06] Lamont, J. L. 2021. ‘Cold and Worthless: The Role of Lead in Curse Tablets’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 151(1): 35–68.
[07] Porter, S. F. 2021. ‘A Church and Its Charms: Space, Affect, and Affiliation in Late Fourth-Century Antioch’. Studies in Late Antiquity 5(4): 639–677.
[08] Makarov, I. A. 2021. ‘Notes on an Ostracon from Northwestern Crimea’. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii 81(3): 737–754.
[09] Law, A. 2021. A Translation and Interpretation of Horace’s Sermones, Book I. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[10] Arias de Haro, F./Díaz Ariño, B./Guzmán Almagro, A. 2021. ‘Una nueva defixio latina conservada en el Museo Arqueológico de Linares (Jaén, España) y las defixiones con forma de tabula ansata’. Chiron 51: 325–354.
[11] Arzt-Grabner, P. ‘Griechisch-römische Fluchtäfelchen als Zeugnisse antiker Magie: Befund und neue Funde’. In: M. Hölscher, M. Lau, S. Luther (eds.), Antike Fluchtafeln und das Neue Testament: Materialität – Ritualpraxis – Texte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 221-244.
[12] Belousov, A. V. 2021. Defixiones Olbiae Ponticae. Leuven/Paris/Bristol, CT: Peeters.
[13] Ribeiro, A. 2022. Archaeology and Intentionality: Understanding Ethics and Freedom in Past and Present Societies. London/New York: Routledge.
[14] Phillips, R. L. 2022. ‘Ritual Ingredients, Folklore, and the Meaning of Invisibility’. In: M. Capasso/P. Davoli/N. Pellé (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Congress of Papyrology, Lecce, 28th July – 3rd August 2019. Lecce: Centro di Studi Papirologici dell’Università del Salento, 791–798.
[15] Nasrallah, L. S. 2022. ‘The Work of Nails: Religion, Mediterranean Antiquity, and Contemporary Black Art’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 90(2): 356–376.
[16] Spence, Ch. 2022. ‘Change and Continuity in Curse Tablets from the Roman World’. In: E. A. Pollard/F. Conti (eds.), Nemo non metuit: Magic in the Roman World. Budapest: Trivent, 53–98.
[17] Sánchez Natalías, C. 2022. Sylloge of Defixiones from the Roman West: A Comprehensive Collection of Curse Tablets from the Fourth Century BCE to the Fifth Century CE. Oxford: Bar Publishing.
[18] Haigh, R. J. 2023. ‘Silencing the Lamb: Joshua as a Military Ritualist’. Biblical Interpretation 31: 158–178.
[19] Lamont, J. L. 2023. In Blood and Ashes: Curse Tablets and Binding Spells in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20] Mandell, A. 2023. ‘Word Craft in the Ancient Levant: Craft-Literacy as the Intersection of Specialized Knowledge’. Maarav 27(1-2): 91-191.
[21] Arampapaslis, K. 2024. Magic in the Literature of the Neronian Period. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
[22] Breitenfeld, S. B. 2024. ‘May the Thief Become as Liquid as Water: Persuasion and Power in a Curse Tablet from Roman Bath’. In: R. B. Benefiel/C. M. Keesling (eds.), Inscriptions and the Epigraphic Habit: The Epigraphic Cultures of Greece, Rome, and Beyond. Leiden: Brill, 321-338.
[23] Nasrallah, L. S. 2024. Ancient Christians and the Power of Curses: Magic, Aesthetics, and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2019. ‘“As Isis Loved Osiris, So Let Matrona Love Theodoros…”: Sympathetic Magic and similia similibus Formulae in Greek and Latin Curse Tablets (Part 2)’. Philologia Classica 14(2): 177–207. (autorský podíl 60%; spoluautorka: Daniela Urbanová)
Ohlasy:
[01] Suárez de la Torre, E. 2021. Eros mágico: Recetas eróticas mágicas del mundo antiguo. Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
[02] Porter, S. F. 2021. ‘A Church and Its Charms: Space, Affect, and Affiliation in Late Fourth-Century Antioch’. Studies in Late Antiquity 5(4): 639–677.
[03] Zografou, A. 2021. ‘Gods around the Grave: Hermes and Hekate in Early Attic Curse Tablets’. Kernos 34: 187-217.
[04] Arias de Haro, F./Díaz Ariño, B./Guzmán Almagro, A. 2021. ‘Una nueva defixio latina conservada en el Museo Arqueológico de Linares (Jaén, España) y las defixiones con forma de tabula ansata’. Chiron 51: 325–354.
[05] Nasrallah, L. S. 2022. ‘The Work of Nails: Religion, Mediterranean Antiquity, and Contemporary Black Art’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 90(2): 356–376.
[06] Spence, Ch. 2022. ‘Change and Continuity in Curse Tablets from the Roman World’. In: E. A. Pollard/F. Conti (eds.), Nemo non metuit: Magic in the Roman World. Budapest: Trivent, 53–98.
[07] Sánchez Natalías, C. 2022. Sylloge of Defixiones from the Roman West: A Comprehensive Collection of Curse Tablets from the Fourth Century BCE to the Fifth Century CE. Oxford: Bar Publishing.
[08] Paul, A. 2022. ‘The Barcelona Papyrus and the Opening Dialogue of the Christian Anaphora: Resituating Egyptian Scribal Practices amid Scholarly Anaphoral Reconstructions’. Ex Fonte/Journal of Ecumenical Studies in Liturgy 1: 129–168.
[09] Zografou, A. 2023. ‘“...Make These Drugs of Mine as Potent as Those of Circe…”: Fatal Women from Myth to Magic’. In: A. Papachrystostomou, A. P. Antonopoulos, A.-F. Mitsis, F. Papadimitriou, P. Taktikou (eds.), Γέρα: Studies in Honor of Professor Menelaos Christopoulos.
[10] Nasrallah, L. S. 2024. Ancient Christians and the Power of Curses: Magic, Aesthetics, and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2018. ‘Invocations of the Muse in Homer and Hesiod: A Cognitive Approach’. Antichthon 52(1): 1–22.
Ohlasy:
[01] Minchin, E. 2021. ‘The Creation of a Storyrealm: The Role of Repetition in Homeric Epic and Alice Oswald’s Memorial’. In: D. Beck (ed.), Repetition, Communication, and Meaning in the Ancient World. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 373–392.
[02] Ercolani, A. 2022. ‘L’ autore e il testo poetico nella cultura greca arcaica e classica’. Seminari Romani di Cultura Greca (n.s.) 11: 55–81.
2017. ‘Il campo semantico di nomen nelle tavole defixionum’. In: A. García Leal/C. E. Prieto Entrialgo (eds.), Latin vulgaire – Latin tardif XI: XI. Congreso Internacional sobre el Latín Vulgar y Tardío (Oviedo, 1–5 de septiembre de 2014). Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms/Weidmann, 616–628. (autorský podíl 20%, spoluautorka: Daniela Urbanová)
Ohlasy:
[01] Barta, A. 2017. ‘A Letter to the Underworld: A Research Report on the Curse Tablet AQ-2’. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 57(1): 45–56.
[02] Logozzo, F. 2017. ‘Genitivus of denomination with nomen, cognomen and praenomen’. Journal of Latin Linguistics 16(2): 167–190.
[03] Luciani, F./Urbanová, D. 2019. ‘Cursing Not Just the Body: Some Remarks on a defixio from Nomentum un the Light of the Role of Female Public Slaves in the Roman World’. Epigraphica 81(1/2): 421–442.
2016. ‘Methodological Consilience of Evolutionary Ethics and Cognitive Science of Religion’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 16(1/2): 144–170.
Ohlasy:
[01] Brownell, P. 2019. ‘Utilizing Consilient Research in the Wider Field’. In: P. Brownell (ed.), Handbook for Theory, Research, and Practice in Gestalt Therapy (2nd Edition). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[02] Moura, J. M. B./da Silva, R. H./Ferreira Júnior, W. S./da Silva, T. C./Albuquerque, U. P. 2020. ‘Theoretical Insights of Evolutionary Psychology: New Opportunities for Studies in Evolutionary Ethnobiology’. Evolutionary Biology 47(1): 6–17.
C. Publikace v domácích odborných časopisech a kolektivních monografiích
2021. ‘Invoking King Solomon on Latin-Inscribed Objects of Practical Magic from Late Antiquity (c. 300–700)’. Listy filologické 144 (3/4): 273–308. (autorský podíl 70%; spoluautorka: Daniela Urbanová)
Ohlasy:
[01] Kotansky, R. D. 2023. ‘A Bronze Medallion in Madrid: Cross-Cultural and Material Transmission of an Amuletic Tradition from Syria to Sicily’. In: R. G. Edmonds III, C. López-Ruiz, S. Torallas-Tovar (eds.), Magic and Religion in the Ancient Mediterranean World: Studies in Honor of Christopher A. Faraone. London: Routledge, 295-324.
2019. ‘Cursing in the Sanctuary: Some Textual Remarks on a Curse Tablet from Kempraten’. Eirene: Studia Graeca et Latina 55: 45–66. (autorský podíl 40%; spoluautorky: Daniela Urbanová, Andrea Barta)
Ohlasy:
[01] Arias de Haro, F./Díaz Ariño, B./Guzmán Almagro, A. 2021. ‘Una nueva defixio latina conservada en el Museo Arqueológico de Linares (Jaén, España) y las defixiones con forma de tabula ansata’. Chiron 51: 325–354.
[02] Spence, Ch. 2022. ‘Change and Continuity in Curse Tablets from the Roman World’. In: E. A. Pollard/F. Conti (eds.), Nemo non metuit: Magic in the Roman World. Budapest: Trivent, 53–98.
[03] Sánchez Natalías, C. 2022. Sylloge of Defixiones from the Roman West: A Comprehensive Collection of Curse Tablets from the Fourth Century BCE to the Fifth Century CE. Oxford: Bar Publishing.
2019. ‘Tertium non datur: Teze k metodologickému schizmatu na poli religionistiky’. Religio 27(2): 151–162.
2018. ‘Vrah alebo hrdina? Recepcia Bruta Mladšieho v talianskom renesančnom humanizme’. In: Ľ. Buzássyová/E. Juríková/J. Grusková (eds.), Ideológia v premenách času v pamiatkach gréckej a latinskej tradície. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 132–149.
2016. ‘Omnibus Omnia: The Reception of Socrates in Ante-Nicene Christian Literature’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 21(1): 31–58.
Ohlasy:
[01] Jedrkiewicz, S. 2019. ‘A Literary Challenge: How to Represent Socrates’ Daimonion’. In: A. Stavru/Ch. Moore (eds.), Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 299–318.
[02] Ripley, J. J. 2019. ‘Glorious Death, Imperial Rome and the Gospel of John’. Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism 15: 31–76.
[03] Macris, C. 2019. ‘Philosophes de la Grèce antique dans un centon monothéiste de Clément d’Alexandrie’. Revue d’histoire des religions 236(4): 767–789.
[04] Maur, G. 2019. ‘From the End to the Beginning: Socrates as Iconoclast in Ibn Abī Uṣaybi‘a and the Contestation of His Biography in Greek and Arabic Sources’. Viator 50(3): 233–258.
[05] Despotis, A. 2022. ‘Jesus als neuer Sokrates in Joh 1–12’. In: A. Despotis/J. B. Wallace (eds.), Greek and Byzantine Philosophical Exegesis. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 22–60.
[06] Mace, C. 2022. ‘The Lives and Deaths of Dionysus the Areopagite’. Le Muséon 135(1/2): 143–207.
[07] Efthymiadis, S./Messis, Ch. 2022. ‘From Plato’s Symposium to Methodius’ and Late Antique Hagiography: “Female” Readings of Male Sexuality’. In: A. Serafim/G. Kazantzidis/K. Demetriou (eds.), Sex and the Ancient City: Sex and Sexual Practices in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 509–528.
[08] Goldhill, S. 2022. The Christian Invention of Time: Temporality and the Literature of Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2016. ‘Beyond Faith and Reason: Epistemic Justification in Earliest Christianity’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 21(2): 125–156.
Ohlasy:
[01] Roubekas, N. 2019. ‘Unexpected Encounters: Aristides the Philosopher, Friedrich Max Müller, and the Origins of Religion’. NNT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion 73(1): 1–16.
2014. ‘Has the Cognitive Science of Religion (Re)defined Religion?’ Religio 22(1): 3–27.
Ohlasy:
[01] Nordin, A. 2015. ‘Indirect Reciprocity and Reputation Management in Religious Morality Relating to Concepts of Supernatural Agents’. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 3(2): 125–153.
[02] Ambasciano, L. 2016. ‘Mind the (Unbridgeable) Gaps: A Cautionary Tale about Pseudoscientific Distortions and Scientific Misconceptions in the Study of Religion’. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 28(2): 141–225.
[03] Szocik, K. 2016. ‘Krytyka epistemicznej funkcji przekonań religijnych w świetle kognitywnych nauk o religii’. Diametros 50: 63–80.
[04] Boşca, L. C. 2016. ‘Ambiguităţile definirii categoriei de religie sui-generis în disciplinele socio-umane’. Studii de teoria categoriilor 8: 107–132.
[05] Uro, R. 2016. Ritual and Christian Beginnings: A Socio-Cognitive Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[06] McClellan, D. 2017. ‘Cognitive Perspectives on Early Christology’. Biblical Interpretation 25: 647–662.
[07] White, C. 2018. ‘What Does Cognitive Science of Religion Explain?’ In: H. van Eyghen/R. Peels/G. van der Brink (eds.), New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief. Berlin: Springer, 35–49.
[08] Di Dio, C./Isernia, S./Ceolaro, C./Marchetti, A./Massaro, D. 2018. ‘Growing Up Thinking of God’s Beliefs: Theory of Mind and Ontological Knowledge’. SAGE Open (October/December 2018).
[09] McClellan, D. 2018. ‘Religion and Description’. In: B. Stoddard (ed.), Method Today: Redescribing Approaches to the Study of Religion. Sheffield/Bristol: Equinox, 106–113.
[10] Ambasciano, L./Coleman III, T. J. 2019. ‘History as a Cancelled Problem? Hilbert Lists, du Bois-Reymond’s Enigmas, and the Scientific Study of Religion’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 87(2): 366–400.
[11] Uro, R. 2019. ‘Introduction: Ritual in the Study of Early Christianity’. In: R. Uro/J. J. Day/E. E. Demaris/R. Roitto (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Ritual. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–17.
[12] Kavanagh, C. M./Jong, J. 2020. ‘Is Japan Religious?’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 14(1): 152–180.
[13] Guthrie, S. E. 2021. ‘Religion as Anthropomorphism: A Cognitive Theory’. In: J. R. Little/T. K. Shackelford (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 48–68.
[14] Smith, J. B. 2021. ‘Role of Spiritual Intelligence in Public Policy in the African American Pentecostal Church’. Journal of Pentecostal Theology 30(1): 145–161.
[15] White, C. 2021. An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion: Connecting Evolution, Brain, Cognition, and Culture. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
[16] Ovsepyan, M. 2022. ‘The Anatomy of Unbelief: Towards a Materialist Approach to the Cognitive Science of (Non)Religion’. In: B. Sollereder/A. McGrath (eds.), Emerging Voices in Science and Theology. London/New York: Routledge, 13–27.
2014. ‘Kognitivní revoluce, behaviorismus a magická teorie mysli’. Filosofický časopis 62(3): 403–416.
2013. ‘Presocratic Philosophy and the Origins of Religion’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 18(1): 57–74.
Ohlasy:
[01] Urbanová, D. 2014. Latinské proklínací tabulky na území římského impéria. Brno: Host/Masarykova univerzita.
[02] Guthrie, S. E. 2015. ‘Religion and Art: A Cognitive and Evolutionary Approach’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 9(3): 283–311.
[03] Ambasciano, L./Pachis, P. 2017. ‘Strangers in a Strange Land: Introducing the Book Review Symposium Section and Jennifer Larson’s Understanding Greek Religion (2016)’. Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4(1): 10–23.
[04] Roubekas, N. P. 2017. An Ancient Theory of Religion: Euhemerism from Antiquity to the Present. New York/London: Routledge.
[05] Lebedev, A. V. 2020. ‘Democritus on Iranian Magi and Ancient Religion: A Quotation from Avesta (Yt.1.7) in Democritus Fragment 580 Luria (= B 30 DK)’. In: N. N. Kazansky (ed.), Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology XXIV: Proceedings of the 24th Conference in Memory of Professor Joseph M. Tronsky, St. Petersburg, 22–24 June 2020. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, 130–150.
[06] Roubekas, N. P. 2020. ‘Presocratic Theories of Religion’. In: N. Roubekas/T. Ryba (eds.), Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth: Contributions in Honor of Robert A. Segal. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 89–105.
[07] Roubekas, N. P. 2022. ‘Doubt’s Polysemy: Atheism, Skepticism, and Theorizing Religion in Greek Antiquity’. Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 23(1): 47–60.
2012. ‘Did Socrates Write? The Evidence of Dion of Prusa (Or. 54.4, 55.12–13) and Epictetus (Diss. 2.1.32)’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 17(2): 25–50.
Ohlasy:
[01] Suvák, V. 2015. Sókratés a sokratika I. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity.
[02] Škvrnda, F. 2017. ‘Platón ako Pseudo-Sókratés? Niekoľko poznámok k problematike autorství filozofického textu’. Ostium 13(4): [online].
[03] Suvák, V. 2019. ‘Aischinés zo Sféttu: Sokratoves alebo podvodník, autor alebo plagiátor?’ Filozofia 74(1): 1–12.
[04] Johnson, B. E. 2019. ‘The Syncretic Socrates of Epictetus’. In: Ch. Moore (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 267–292.
[05] Cepko, J./Kalaš, A./Suvák, V. 2021. Aeschinis Socratici Fragmenta/Zlomky Aischina zo Sfétta: Úvodná štúdia, grécky a latinský text, preklad zlomkov a komentár. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave.
2012. ‘Some Methodological Remarks on the Phonology of Ancient Greek’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 17(1): 33–50.
Ohlasy:
[01] Batisti, R. 2021. ‘Verner’s Law in Italy—and Greece: Un capitolo di storia della ricerca linguistica’. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 106(2): 129–163.
2011. ‘Lucretius and the Modern Interdisciplinary Critique of Religion’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 16(1): 15–28.
Ohlasy:
[01] Ambasciano, L./Pachis, P. 2017. Strangers in a Strange Land: Introducing the Book Review Symposium Section and Jennifer Larson’s Understanding Greek Religion (2016). Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4(1): 10–23.
[02] Myakin, T. 2019. The Goddess Venus in Lucretius’ Poem De Rerum Natura. ΣΧΟΛΗ: Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition 13(1): 153–179.
D. Zahraniční recenze
2022. ‘Celsus in His World: Philosophy, Polemic, and Religion in the Second Century’. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2022.09.30.
2019. ‘Ways of Communication between Gods and Humans’. The Classical Review 69(1): 170–173.
2017. ‘An Ancient Theory of Religion: Euhemerism from Antiquity to the Present. Roubekas, N. P., New York and London: Routledge 2017’. Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4(1): 103–106.
E. Domácí recenze
2017. ‘Anthologia Graeca, Bände I–III. Übersetzt und erläutert von Jens Gerlach, Dirk Uwe Hansen, Christoph Kugelmeier, Peter von Möllendorff und Kyriakos Savvidis. Hansen, Dirk U. (ed.), Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann 2011–2016.’ Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22(1): 242–244.
2015. ‘Antisthenis fragmenta – Antisthenove zlomky: Úvodná štúdia, grécky a latinský text, slovenský preklad a komentár k zlomkom. Kalaš, A. – V. Suvák, Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave 2015’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 20(2): 213–215.
2014. ‘Zrození světa. Kosmologie básníka Hésioda. Luhanová, E., Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart 2014’. Listy filologické 139(3–4): 469–473.
2013. ‘Učebnice klasické řečtiny. Horáček F. – R. Chlup, Praha: Academia 2012’. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 18(1): 226–230.
F. Překlady
2020. Isaac Newton: Matematické principy přírodní filozofie. Praha/Brno: Togga. ISBN 978-80-7476-177-5, 242 pp. (autorský podíl 50%; spoluautoři: Daniel Špelda, Jan Novotný, Jindřiška Svobodová, Helena Durnová)
2019. Tomáš Špidlík: Z pokladnice otců. Patristická čítanka na každý den. Olomouc: Refugium Velehrad-Roma. ISBN 978-80-7412-333-7, 461 pp. (autorský podíl 40%; spoluautoři: Tomáš Jeniš, Irena Radová)
